Integrating communicative action, conversations and decision theory to coordinate agents
AGENTS '97 Proceedings of the first international conference on Autonomous agents
Modelling social action for AI agents
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue: artificial intelligence 40 years later
Dialogue Frames in Agent Communication
ICMAS '98 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi Agent Systems
Designing Conversation Policies using Joint Intention Theory
ICMAS '98 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi Agent Systems
Updating Mental States from Communication
ATAL '00 Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents VII. Agent Theories Architectures and Languages
Agent Theory for Team Formation by Dialogue
ATAL '00 Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents VII. Agent Theories Architectures and Languages
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Multiagent commitment alignment
Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2
European research and development of intelligent information agents: the agentlink perspective
Intelligent information agents
Characterising responsibility in organisational structures: the problem of many hands
DEON'10 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Deontic logic in computer science
Informed deliberation during norm-governed practical reasoning
AAMAS'05 Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on Agents, Norms and Institutions for Regulated Multi-Agent Systems
Exploiting domain knowledge in making delegation decisions
ADMI'11 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Agents and Data Mining Interaction
Combining event-and state-based norms
Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
An agent may decide to delegate tasks to others. The act of delegating a task by one autonomous agent to another can be carried out by the performance of one or more imperative communication acts. In this paper, the semantics of imperatives are specified using a language of actions and states. It is further shown how the model can be used to distinguish between whole-hearted and mere extensional satisfaction of an imperative, and how this may be used to specify the semantics of imperatives in agent communication languages.