Texture feature performance for image segmentation
Pattern Recognition
Digital image processing (2nd ed.)
Digital image processing (2nd ed.)
A review of recent texture segmentation and feature extraction techniques
CVGIP: Image Understanding
Handbook of pattern recognition & computer vision
Filtering for Texture Classification: A Comparative Study
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Image Processing, Analysis, and Machine Vision
Image Processing, Analysis, and Machine Vision
Is There any Texture in the Image?
ICPR '96 Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition - Volume 2
Evolving Texture Features by Genetic Programming
Proceedings of the 2007 EvoWorkshops 2007 on EvoCoMnet, EvoFIN, EvoIASP,EvoINTERACTION, EvoMUSART, EvoSTOC and EvoTransLog: Applications of Evolutionary Computing
Fourier fractal descriptors for colored texture analysis
ACIVS'11 Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Advanced concepts for intelligent vision systems
Texture databases - A comprehensive survey
Pattern Recognition Letters
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
The analysis of texture in images is an important area of study. Image benchmarks such as Meastex and Vistex have been developed for researchers to compare their experiments on these texture benchmarks. In this paper we compare five different texture analysis methods on these benchmarks in terms of their recognition ability. Since these benchmarks are limited in terms of their content, we have divided each image into n images and performed our analysis on a larger data set. In this paper we investigate how well the following texture extraction methods perform: autocorrelation, co-occurrence matrices, edge frequency, Law's, and primitive length. We aim to determine if some of these methods outperform others by a significant margin and whether by combining them into a single feature set will have a significant impact on the overall recognition performance. For our analysis we have used the linear and nearest neighbour classifiers.