Circuits Over PP and PL

  • Authors:
  • Richard Beigel;Bin Fu

  • Affiliations:
  • -;-

  • Venue:
  • CCC '97 Proceedings of the 12th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity
  • Year:
  • 1997

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Wilson's model of oracle gates provides a framework for considering reductions whose strength is intermediate between truth-table and Turing. Improving on a stream of results by Beigel, Reingold, Spielman, Fortnow, and Ogihara (STOC '91, Structures '91, FOCS '96), we prove that PL and PP are closed under NC_1 reductions. This answers an open problem of Ogihara (FOCS '96). More generally, we show that NC_{k+1}^PP = AC_k^PP and NC_{k+1}^PL = AC_k^PL for all k = 0. On the other hand, we construct an oracle A such that NC_k^{PP^A} NC_{k+1}^{PP^A} for all integers k = 1. Slightly weaker than NC_1 reductions are Boolean formula reductions. We ask whether PL and PP are closed under Boolean formula reductions. This is a nontrivial question despite NC_1 = BF, because that equality is easily seen not to relativize. We prove that P^PP_{log^2{n}/loglogn-T} is a subset of BF^PP is a subset of PrTIME(n^{O(logn)}). Because P^PP_{log^2{n}/loglogn-T} is not a subset of PP relative to an oracle, we think it is unlikely that PP is closed under Boolean formula reductions. We also show it is unlikely that PL is closed under BF reductions.