Goals Guiding Design: PVM and MPI

  • Authors:
  • William Gropp;Ewing Lusk

  • Affiliations:
  • -;-

  • Venue:
  • CLUSTER '02 Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing
  • Year:
  • 2002

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.01

Visualization

Abstract

PVM and MPI, two systems for programming clusters, are often compared. The comparisons usually start with the unspoken assumption that PVM and MPI represent different solutions to the same problem. In this paper we show that, in fact, the two systems often are solving different problems. In cases where the problems do match but the solutions chosen by PVM and MPI are different, we explain the reasons for the differences. Usually such differences can be traced to explicit differences in the goals of the two systems, their origins, or the relationship between their specifications and their implementations. For example, we show that the requirement for portability and performance across many platforms caused MPI to choose approaches different from those made by PVM, which is able to exploit the similarities of network-connected systems.