Ethernet: distributed packet switching for local computer networks
Communications of the ACM
Issues in the design and use of a distributed file system
ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review
ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review
How to connect stable memory to a computer
ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review
NAMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION IN A DECENTRALIZED COMPUTER SYSTEM
NAMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION IN A DECENTRALIZED COMPUTER SYSTEM
The impact of recovery on concurrency control
PODS '89 Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems
A cost-effective, high-bandwidth storage architecture
Proceedings of the eighth international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems
Shadowed management of free disk pages with a linked list
ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS)
Performance of a DECnet based disk block server
SIGMETRICS '84 Proceedings of the 1984 ACM SIGMETRICS conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems
Advanced program-to-program communication in SNA
IBM Systems Journal
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper compares two working file servers in terms of their design goals, implementation issues, performance, and service experience. One server, the Xerox Distributed File System (XDFS) [10], was built at the Xerox Palo Alto Research Center; the other, the Cambridge File Server (CFS) [2, 3, 4], was built at the Cambridge University Computer Laboratory. Both file servers support concurrent random access to files over a network, and each offers an atomic transaction mechanism covering modifications to files.