Partial-order transport service for multimedia and other applications
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)
Retransmission-based error control for continuous media traffic in packet-switched networks
Retransmission-based error control for continuous media traffic in packet-switched networks
An analytic study of partially ordered transport services
Computer Networks and ISDN Systems
Performance analysis of partially ordered and partially reliable transport services
Performance analysis of partially ordered and partially reliable transport services
Retransmission-based partially reliable transport service: an analytic model
INFOCOM'96 Proceedings of the Fifteenth annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies conference on The conference on computer communications - Volume 2
Temporal Partial Order and Partial Reliability Service for Distributed Multimedia Applications
MMM '98 Proceedings of the 1998 Conference on MultiMedia Modeling
QoS Management at the Transport Layer
ITCC '00 Proceedings of the The International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC'00)
A configurable and extensible transport protocol
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
An analytic model is presented for a partially reliable transport protocol based on retransmissions. The model illustrates tradeoffs between two QoS parameters (delay and throughput), and various levels of reliability. The model predicts that the use of reliable transport service when an application only needs a partially reliable one causes considerable throughput decreases and delay increases in lossy networks. On the other hand, over lossy networks, unreliable transport service is unable to respect an application' s loss tolerance. In lossy environments, partially reliable transport service avoids the extra cost of reliable transport service, and, simultaneously, guarantees the minimal reliability that an application requires. Retransmission-based partially reliable transport service can be provided through either sender-based or receiverbased loss detection and recovery. Results show that both techniques provide almost identical reliability and delay. However, a sender-based approach provides better throughput than a receiver-based approach at high ack loss rates.