Constructing literature abstracts by computer: techniques and prospects
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal - Special issue on natural language processing and information retrieval
Self-organizing maps
Advances in Automatic Text Summarization
Advances in Automatic Text Summarization
Towards better NLP system evaluation
HLT '94 Proceedings of the workshop on Human Language Technology
NAACL-ANLP-AutoSum '00 Proceedings of the 2000 NAACL-ANLPWorkshop on Automatic summarization - Volume 4
Task-based evaluation of text summarization using Relevance Prediction
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
PeRSSonal's core functionality evaluation: Enhancing text labeling through personalized summaries
Data & Knowledge Engineering
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In general terms the evaluation of a summary depends on how close it is to the chief points in the source text. This begets the question as to what are the chief points in the source text and how is this information used in itself in identifying the source text. This is crucially important when we discuss automatic evaluation of summaries. So the question of main points is the source text. Typically, this would be around a nucleus of keywords. However, the salience, the frequency, and the relationship of the text with other texts in the collection (of these keywords is perhaps) are important. Text categorisation using neural networks explicates these points well and also has a practical impact.