The Many Meanings of Open Source
IEEE Software
Open Borders? Immigration in Open Source Projects
MSR '07 Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories
What do large commits tell us?: a taxonomical study of large commits
Proceedings of the 2008 international working conference on Mining software repositories
Measuring developer contribution from software repository data
Proceedings of the 2008 international working conference on Mining software repositories
Automated software license analysis
Automated Software Engineering
Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice
A sentence-matching method for automatic license identification of source code files
Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM international conference on Automated software engineering
A study of language usage evolution in open source software
Proceedings of the 8th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories
A development process for building OSS-Based applications
SPW'05 Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on Unifying the Software Process Spectrum
A simple generic library for c
ICSR'06 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Reuse of Off-the-Shelf Components
International Journal of Open Source Software and Processes
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Most empirical studies about Open Source (OS)projectsor products are vertical and usually deal with the flagship,successful projects.There is a substantial lack of horizontal studies to shed light on the whole population of projects,including failures.This paper presents a horizontalstudy aimed at characterizing OS projects.We analyze a sample of around 400 projects from a popular OS project repository.Each project is characterized bya number of attributes.We analyze these attributes statically and over time.The main results show that few projects are capable ofattracting a meaningful community of developers.Themajority of projects is made by few (in many cases one)person with a very slow pace of evolution.