Formation of general GT cells: an operation-based approach
Computers and Industrial Engineering - Cellular manufacturing systems: design, analysis and implementation
Genetic Algorithms and Grouping Problems
Genetic Algorithms and Grouping Problems
Generating Experimental Data for the Generalized Assignment Problem
Operations Research
Genetic algorithms based approach to database vertical partition
Journal of Intelligent Information Systems
A hybrid grouping genetic algorithm for assigning students to preferred laboratory groups
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
A hybrid grouping genetic algorithm for citywide ubiquitous WiFi access deployment
CEC'09 Proceedings of the Eleventh conference on Congress on Evolutionary Computation
Near optimal citywide WiFi network deployment using a hybrid grouping genetic algorithm
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Computers and Operations Research
A new grouping genetic algorithm for clustering problems
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Solution approaches to the course timetabling problem
Artificial Intelligence Review
A particle swarm optimizer for grouping problems
Information Sciences: an International Journal
| Hi-index | 0.01 |
Construction firms specializing in large commercial buildings often purchase large steel plates, cut them into pieces and then weld the pieces into H-beams and other construction components. We formalize the material ordering and cutting problem faced by this industry and propose a grouping genetic algorithm, called CPGEA, for efficiently controlling the relevant costs. We test the quality of CPGEA in various ways. Three sets of simulated problems with known optimal solutions are solved using CPGEA, and the gap between its solutions and optimal solutions is measured. The same problem sets are also solved with an expert system and a multi-start greedy heuristic. CPGEA solutions are found to be consistently lower cost than the competing methods. The difference in solution quality is most pronounced for difficult problems requiring multiple identical plates in the optimal solution. CPGEA is also tested using data from actual construction projects of a company faced with this problem. Since an optimal solution for the problems is not available, a lower bound is created. For the historical problems tested, the average percent difference between CPGEA solutions and the lower bound is 0.67%. To put this performance in context, the results of solving these problems with an expert system and using experienced engineers is also reported. Of these three methods, CPGEA achieves the best performance and the human experts the worst performance.