Software engineering practice versus evidence-based software engineering research
REBSE '05 Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Realising evidence-based software engineering
Integrating agile software development into stage-gate managed product development
Empirical Software Engineering
What Do We Know about Defect Detection Methods?
IEEE Software
A survey of software project managers on software process change
Proceedings of the Second ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement
REET '09 Proceedings of the 2009 Fourth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering Education and Training
Evaluating a model of software managers' information needs: an experiment
Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
Information needs for software development analytics
Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Software Engineering
Empirical studies for innovation dissemination: ten years of experience
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In order to investigate practitioners' opinions of softwareprocess and software process improvement, we havecollected a large volume of qualitative evidence from 13companies. At the same time, other researchers havereported investigations of practitioners, and we areinterested in how their reports may relate to our evidence.Thus, other research publications can also be treated as aform of qualitative data. In this paper, we review adviceon a method, content analysis, that is used to analysequalitative data. We use content analysis to describe andanalyse discussions on software process and softwareprocess improvement. We report preliminary findingsfrom an analysis of both the focus group evidence andfour publications.Our main finding is that there is an apparentcontradiction between developers saying that they wantevidence for software process improvement, and whatdevelopers will accept as evidence. This presents a seriousproblem for research: even if researchers coulddemonstrate a strong, reliable relationship betweensoftware process improvement and improvedorganisational performance, there would still be theproblem of convincing practitioners that the evidenceapplies to their particular situation.