Separating figure from ground with a Boltzmann machine
Vision, brain, and cooperative computation
Dynamic threshold determination by local and global edge evaluation
Graphical Models and Image Processing
Edges: saliency measures and automatic thresholding
Machine Vision and Applications
Ground from figure discrimination
Computer Vision and Image Understanding - Special issue on perceptual organization in computer vision
Evolutionary Approaches to Figure-Ground Separation
Applied Intelligence
Figure-Ground Discrimination: A Combinatorial Optimization Approach
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Figure-ground segmentation using Tabu search
ISCV '95 Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Vision
Figure-ground separation by a dynamical system
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Unimodal thresholding for edge detection
Pattern Recognition
On candidates selection for hysteresis thresholds in edge detection
Pattern Recognition
Hi-index | 0.10 |
Two techniques for extracting foreground edges from an edge map are quantitatively tested and compared. Although Amir and Lindenbaum's algorithm (Comput. Vision and Image Understanding 76 (1) (1999) 7) and Venkatesh and Rosin's algorithm (Comput. Vision Graphics Image Process. 57 (2) (1995) 146) operate on very different principles it is shown that their results or of similar quality. The advantage of Venkatesh and Rosin's algorithm is that it is computationally more efficient and does not require tuning parameters.