Why to incorporate a data definition language into a CAD frameworks extension language

Authors:
Klaus Gröning;Walter Heijenga
Affiliations:
Cadlab, Paderborn, Germany;Cadlab, Paderborn, Germany
Venue:
EURO-DAC '91 Proceedings of the conference on European design automation
Year:
1991

Citing 4
Cited 0

The C++ programming language

The C++ programming language
The object-oriented integration methodology of the Cadlab work station design environment

DAC '89 Proceedings of the 26th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data

ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS) - Special issue: papers from the international conference on very large data bases: September 22–24, 1975, Framingham, MA
Database abstractions: aggregation and generalization

ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS)

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper takes part in the discussion on extension languages for CAD frameworks. We show that the incorporation of a Data Definition Language (DDL) not only makes sense but is a must for a serious extension language, if it intends to meet all requirements that occur in CAD frameworks. To illustrate this approach we introduce TIDL (Tool Integration Description Language), a representative for an extension language with an incorparted DDL.