JVM versus CLR: a comparative study

Authors:
Jeremy Singer
Affiliations:
University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
Venue:
PPPJ '03 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Principles and practice of programming in Java
Year:
2003

Citing 9
Cited 4

The C programming language

The C programming language
The Java programming language (2nd ed.)

The Java programming language (2nd ed.)
Benchmarking Java against C and Fortran for scientific applications

Proceedings of the 2001 joint ACM-ISCOPE conference on Java Grande
Inside Microsoft .NET IL Assembler

Inside Microsoft .NET IL Assembler
The Definition of Standard ML

The Definition of Standard ML
Java Virtual Machine Specification

Java Virtual Machine Specification
Compiling for the .Net Common Language Runtime

Compiling for the .Net Common Language Runtime
The Design of a Resourceable and Retargetable Binary Translator

WCRE '99 Proceedings of the Sixth Working Conference on Reverse Engineering
Programming C#

Programming C#

Efficient virtual machine support of runtime structural reflection

Science of Computer Programming
LLVM-based and scalable MPEG-RVC decoder

Journal of Real-Time Image Processing
The varying faces of a program transformation systems

ACM Inroads
A hybrid class- and prototype-based object model to support language-neutral structural intercession

Information and Software Technology

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We present empirical evidence to demonstrate that there is little or no difference between the Java Virtual Machine and the .NET Common Language Runtime, as regards the compilation and execution of object-oriented programs. Then we give details of a case study that proves the superiority of the Common Language Runtime as a target for imperative programming language compilers (in particular GCC).