Enhancing disjunctive logic programming systems by SAT checkers

  • Authors:

  • Christoph Koch;Nicola Leone;Gerald Pfeifer

  • Affiliations:

  • Institut für Informationssysteme, Technische Universität Wien, A-1040 Wien, Austria;Department of Mathematics, University of Calabria, 87030 Rende (CS), Italy;Institut für Informationssysteme, Technische Universität Wien, A-1040 Wien, Austria

  • Venue:
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Year:
  • 2003

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Disjunctive logic programming (DLP) with stable model semantics is a powerful nonmonotonic formalism for knowledge representation and reasoning. Reasoning with DLP is harder than with normal (v-free) logic programs, because stable model checking--deciding whether a given model is a stable model of a propositional DLP program--is co-NP-complete, while it is polynomial for normal logic programs.This paper proposes a new transformation ΓM(P), which reduces stable model checking to UNSAT--i.e., to deciding whether a given CNF formula is unsatisfiable. The stability of a model M of a program P thus can be verified by calling a Satisfiability Checker on the CNF formula ΓM(P). The transformation is parsimonious (i.e., no new symbol is added), and efficiently computable, as it runs in logarithmic space (and therefore in polynomial time). Moreover, the size of the generated CNF formula never exceeds the size of the input (and is usually much smaller). We complement this transformation with modular evaluation results, which allow for efficient handling of large real-world reasoning problems.The proposed approach to stable model checking has been implemented in DLV--a state-of-the-art implementation of DLP. A number of experiments and benchmarks have been run using SATZ as Satisfiability checker. The results of the experiments are very positive and confirm the usefulness of our techniques.