From text to speech: the MITalk system
From text to speech: the MITalk system
The contribution of parsing to prosodic phrasing in an experimental text-to-speech system
ACL '86 Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
An Integrated Statistical Model for Tagging and Chunking Unrestricted Text
TDS '00 Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Text, Speech and Dialogue
Robustness beyond shallowness: incremental deep parsing
Natural Language Engineering
A corpus-based statistical approach to automatic book indexing
ANLC '92 Proceedings of the third conference on Applied natural language processing
Finite state segmentation of discourse into clauses
Natural Language Engineering
Tagging and chunking with bigrams
COLING '00 Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 2
Introduction to the CoNLL-2001 shared task: clause identification
ConLL '01 Proceedings of the 2001 workshop on Computational Natural Language Learning - Volume 7
Intraclausal Coordination and Clause Detection as a Preprocessing Step to Dependency Parsing
TSD '09 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Text, Speech and Dialogue
Clause boundary recognition using support vector machines
PRICAI'06 Proceedings of the 9th Pacific Rim international conference on Artificial intelligence
Clause boundary identification using conditional random fields
CICLing'08 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (TCBB)
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
The paper presents and compares two different methods of parsing, a regular expression method and a stochastic method, with respect to their success in identifying basic clauses in unrestricted English text. These methods of parsing were developed in order to be applied to the task of improving the detection of large prosodic units in the Bell Labs text-to-speech system, and were so applied experimentally. The paper also discusses the notion of basic clause that was defined as the parsing target. The result of a comparison of the error rates of the two parsing methods in the recognition of basic clauses showed that there was a 13% error rate for the regular expression method and a 6.5% error rate for the stochastic method.