Qualitative reasoning about physical systems
Qualitative reasoning about physical systems
Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse
Computational Linguistics
The lexicon, grammatical categories and temporal reasoning
on Advances in artificial intelligence
Formal Theories of the Commonsense World
Formal Theories of the Commonsense World
Commonsense metaphysics and lexical semantics
ACL '86 Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
A computational semantics for natural language
ACL '85 Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
Aspect, aspectual class, and the temporal structure of narrative
Computational Linguistics - Special issue on tense and aspect
The interpretation of tense in discourse
ACL '87 Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
COLING '88 Proceedings of the 12th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 2
Temporal reasoning about fuzzy intervals
Artificial Intelligence
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper proposes a new framework for discourse analysis, in the spirit of Grosz and Sidner (1986), Webber (1987a,b) but differentiated with respect to the type or genre of discourse. It is argued that different genres call for different representations and processing strategies; particularly important is the distinction between subjective, performative discourse and objective discourse, of which narrative is a primary example. This paper concentrates on narratives and introduces the notions of temporal focus (proposed also in Webber (1987b)) and narrative move. The processing tasks involved in reconstructing the temporal structure of a narrative (Webber's e/s structure) are formulated in terms of these two notions. The remainder of the paper analyzes the durational and aspectual knowledge needed for those tasks. Distinctions are established between grammatical aspect, aspectual class and the aspectual perspective of a sentence in discourse; it is shown that in English, grammatical aspect under-determines the aspectual perspective.