Constraint Grammar: A Language-Independent System for Parsing Unrestricted Text
Constraint Grammar: A Language-Independent System for Parsing Unrestricted Text
Building a large annotated corpus of English: the penn treebank
Computational Linguistics - Special issue on using large corpora: II
Using Multiattribute Prediction Suffix Graphs for Spanish Part-of-Speech Tagging
IDA '01 Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis
ANLC '97 Proceedings of the fifth conference on Applied natural language processing
An experiment on the upper bound of interjudge agreement: the case of tagging
EACL '99 Proceedings of the ninth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
A flexible POS tagger using an automatically acquired language model
ACL '98 Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and Eighth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Comparing a linguistic and a stochastic tagger
ACL '98 Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and Eighth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Linguistic indeterminacy as a source of errors in tagging
COLING '96 Proceedings of the 16th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 2
Detecting errors in part-of-speech annotation
EACL '03 Proceedings of the tenth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Volume 1
Does tagging help parsing?: a case study on finite state parsing
FSMNLP '09 Proceedings of the International Workshop on Finite State Methods in Natural Language Processing
Part-of-speech tagging from 97% to 100%: is it time for some linguistics?
CICLing'11 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing - Volume Part I
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Is it possible to specify a grammatical representation (descriptors and their application guidelines) to such a degree that it can be consistently applied by different grammarians e.g. for producing a benchmark corpus for parser evaluation? Arguments for and against have been given, but very little empirical evidence. In this article we report on a double-blind experiment with a surface-oriented morphosyntactic grammatical representation used in a large-scale English parser. We argue that a consistently applicable representation for morphology and also shallow syntax can be specified. A grammatical representation with a near-100% coverage of running text can be specified with a reasonable effort, especially if the representation is based on structural distinctions (i.e. it is structurally resolvable).