ACE '05 Proceedings of the 7th Australasian conference on Computing education - Volume 42
A framework for transforming structured analysis and design artifacts to UML
SIGDOC '06 Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Reflecting current industry trends, most Computer Science and Software Engineering degreeprograms place strong emphasis on the Unified Modelling Language (UML) as a graphical approach to software design and requirement analysis. To a lesser extent, Formal Methods utilizing languages like Z are found within many degree programs, but often only as a recommended elective as suggested by IEEE Computing Curricula 2001. Data Flow Diagrams(DFDs) and other graphical techniques are also included in the curricula of many programs. The various approaches are often taught in isolation, with little connection demonstrated between them. This paper describes the benefits of an integrated approach when teaching these design formalisms to undergraduate students. A significant educational benefit of an integrated approach is that it fosters a deeper understanding of the notational semantics available in any one technique. Co-development utilizing multiple techniques empowers the student to exploit the strengths of alternate representations of the same model. It also provides a rigorous means to analyse the correctness and consistency of graphical design representations by utilizing more formal methods.