Proceedings of the 1975 workshop on Theoretical issues in natural language processing

  • Authors:
  • Bonnie L. Nash-Webber;Roger Schank

  • Affiliations:
  • Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge, MA;Yale University, New Haven, CT

  • Venue:
  • TINLAP '75 Proceedings of the 1975 workshop on Theoretical issues in natural language processing
  • Year:
  • 1975

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This collection of papers forms the point of departure of an interdisciplinary workshop on Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing sponsored by the Mathematical Social Sciences Board. The impetus for such a workshop, bringing together researchers and students from computational linguistics, psychology, linguistics and artificial intelligence, was a desire to provide a forum at which people with different interests in, and consequently different emphases on, the problems of natural language understanding, could learn of the models developed and difficult issues faced by people working on other aspects of understanding. It was felt that an exposure to different aspects and emphases would have a very beneficial effect on all fields of natural language research, and that without such an interchange the potential for much of that research would not be realized.The idea behind this early circulated volume of position papers was to familiarize all the participants, speakers and audience alike, with the current ideas and paradigms in natural language understanding -- their evolution, scope and deficiencies. Specifically, the contributing speakers were asked to address such questions as:1. What computational models and mechanisms have been proposed up to now in these areas?2. What aspects of human language behavior are they meant to account for?3. Are these models compatible?4. Is there a single global view of language understanding and use that is adequately modelled by some combination of them?5. Are there still significant aspects of human language use which they cannot account for?6. What is the best model of human language use that can be assembled out of the concepts that have been developed in computational linguistics, linguistics, psychology and artificial intelligence?7. How well does it really approximate what humans do with language?8. With respect to gaps in that model, is there anything currently in the wind adequate to complete them?Where speakers were not able to get us their position papers in time, their papers will appear in a supplement to this volume to be available at the workshop and to be included in all copies of this volume subsequently distributed.