A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols
MobiCom '98 Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking
A group mobility model for ad hoc wireless networks
MSWiM '99 Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international workshop on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems
MSWiM '02 Proceedings of the 5th ACM international workshop on Modeling analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems
Mobility modeling in wireless networks: categorization, smooth movement, and border effects
ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review
Proceedings of the 9th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
User mobility modeling and characterization of mobility patterns
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Extending mobility to publish/subscribe systems using a pro-active caching approach
Mobile Information Systems
Extending mobility to publish/subscribe systems using a pro-active caching approach
Mobile Information Systems
A cluster-based web service discovery in MANET environments
Mobile Information Systems
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
We quantatively analyze the differences between a realisticmobility model, TRANSIMS, and several synthetic mobilitymodels. New synthetic models were created by modifyingthe standard random way point model in several waysin an attempt to make it more realistic. We then comparethese enhanced models with the TRANSIMS data as well asthe random walk and standard random way-point models,using both new spatial based measures as well as networksimulation performance.The velocity component and the spatial distributions ofnodes over the space were analyzed and compared to theTRANSIMS data in order to be able to more generally analyzethe models outside of the context of a network simulation.We also compared the performance of each modelin various simulations of a wireless ad hoc network, witha particular emphasis on systematically varying some ofthe network parameters to determine the sensitivity of eachmodel to differing network conditions. We then relate thesimulation results to the more general spatial methods ofmobility model comparisons that we developed.