A Flexible and Semantic-Aware Publication Infrastructure for Web Services
CAiSE '08 Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering
Technical challenges in market-driven automated service provisioning
Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on Middleware for service oriented computing
Unified publication and discovery of semantic Web services
ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB)
Reference architectural styles for service-oriented computing
NPC'07 Proceedings of the 2007 IFIP international conference on Network and parallel computing
Semantic-enabled organization of web services
APWeb'08 Proceedings of the 10th Asia-Pacific web conference on Progress in WWW research and development
A Proximity-Based Self-Organizing Framework for Service Composition and Discovery
CCGRID '10 Proceedings of the 2010 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing
A distributed approach for the federation of heterogeneous registries
ICSOC'06 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Service-Oriented Computing
A self-organizing P2P framework for collective service discovery
Journal of Network and Computer Applications
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Web services enhance current web functionality byaltering its nature from document to service-oriented. Asthe number of web services increases, it becomesincreasingly important to provide a scalableinfrastructure of Registries that allows both developersand end-users to perform discovery of semantic webenabled services. The discovery of services needs to bebased on QoS characteristics in order to enable resultranking and service selection. Current web servicepublication and discovery mechanisms, such as UDDI,either address these issues partially or not at all. In thispaper, we build on the enabling technologies of WebServices, Peer-to-Peer and Semantic Web in an attempt toaddress all these important dimensions of servicepublication and discovery. More specifically, we use ahybrid peer-to-peer topology to organize Registries basedon domains. In such a model, each Registry retains itsautonomy, meaning that it can use the publication anddiscovery mechanisms as well as the ontology of itschoice.