Parsing owl dl: trees or triples?

Authors:
Sean K. Bechhofer;Jeremy J. Carroll
Affiliations:
University of Manchester, Manchester;Hewlett-Packard Labs, Bristol
Venue:
Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web
Year:
2004

Citing 3
Cited 4

Yacc: a parser generator

UNIX Vol. II
The description logic handbook: theory, implementation, and applications

The description logic handbook: theory, implementation, and applications
Jena: implementing the semantic web recommendations

Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters

Jena: implementing the semantic web recommendations

Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters
OWL 2: The next step for OWL

Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web
A Flexible API and Editor for SKOS

ESWC 2009 Heraklion Proceedings of the 6th European Semantic Web Conference on The Semantic Web: Research and Applications
WWW business applications based on the cellular model

Journal of Computer Science and Technology

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The Web Ontology Language (OWL) defines three classes of documents: Lite, DL, and Full. All RDF/XML documents are OWL Full documents, some OWL Full documents are also OWL DL documents, and some OWL DL documents are also OWL Lite documents. This paper discusses parsing and species recognition -- that is the process of determining whether a given document falls into the OWL Lite, DL or Full class. Wedescribe two alternative approaches to this task, one based on abstract syntax trees, the other on RDF triples, and compare their key characteristics.