Multicast operation of the ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing protocol
MobiCom '99 Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking
Tree multicast strategies in mobile, multishop wireless networks
Mobile Networks and Applications
Wireless integrated network sensors
Communications of the ACM
Ad hoc networking: an introduction
Ad hoc networking
Neighbor supporting ad hoc multicast routing protocol
MobiHoc '00 Proceedings of the 1st ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing
Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks
HICSS '00 Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-Volume 8 - Volume 8
A Performance Comparison of the Temporally-Ordered Routing Algorithm and Ideal Link-State Routing
ISCC '98 Proceedings of the Third IEEE Symposium on Computers & Communications
IEEE Communications Magazine
The core-assisted mesh protocol
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Adaptive multicast trees on static ad hoc networks: tradeoffs between delay and energy consumption
UIC'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs), energy efficiency is as important as general performance measures such as delay or packet delivery ratio since it directly affects the network lifetime. In this chapter, we introduce two different approaches for energy efficient multicast protocols developed for MANETs. The first group of energy efficient multicast protocols is based on the assumption that the transmission power is controllable. Under this assumption, the problem of finding a tree with the least consumed power becomes a conventional optimization problem on a graph where the weighted link cost corresponds to the transmission power required for transmitting a packet between the two nodes of the link. The second approach focuses on maximizing sleep mode operation supported by the lower level protocol. A mobile node in tree-based protocols can safely put itself into low power sleep mode for conserving energy if it is not a designated receiver under the employed broadcast-based mesh protocol. It is shown that mesh-based protocols are more robust to mobility, but tree-based protocols may be preferable when energy is a primary concern.