Anaphora resolution: a multi-strategy approach

  • Authors:
  • Jaime G. Carbonell;Ralf D. Brown

  • Affiliations:
  • Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA;Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA

  • Venue:
  • COLING '88 Proceedings of the 12th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 1
  • Year:
  • 1988

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Anaphora resolution has proven to be a very difficult problem; it requires the integrated application of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic knowledge. This paper examines the hypothesis that instead of attempting to construct a monolithic method for resolving anaphora, the combination of multiple strategies, each exploiting a different knowledge source, proves more effective - theoretically and computationally. Cognitive plausibility is established in that human judgements of the optimal anaphoric referent accord with those of the strategy-based method, and human inability to determine a unique referent corresponds to the cases where different strategies offer conflicting candidates for the anaphoric referent.