An algorithm for generating quantifier scopings
Computational Linguistics
Prolog and natural-language analysis
Prolog and natural-language analysis
Discourse, anaphora and parsing
COLING '86 Proceedings of the 11th coference on Computational linguistics
Quantifiers, Anaphora, and Intensionality
Journal of Logic, Language and Information
Computational Linguistics
Computing with features as formulae
Computational Linguistics
An algorithm for generating non-redundant quantifier scopings
EACL '91 Proceedings of the fifth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Deep comprehension, generation and translation of weather forecasts (weathra)
COLING '92 Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 2
About Application and Implementation of Semantic Meta Parsing
Proceedings of the 2005 conference on New Trends in Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques: Proceedings of the fourth SoMeT_W05
Incremental syntactic and semantic processing
IJCAI'91 Proceedings of the 12th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper describes a way of expressing syntactic rules that associate semantic formulae with strings, but in a manner that is independent of the syntactic details of these formulae. In particular we show how the same rules construct predicate argument formulae in the style of Montague grammar[13], representations reminiscent of situation semantics(Barwise and Perry [2]) and of the event logic of Davidson [5], or representations inspired by the discourse representations proposed by Kamp [9]. The idea is that semantic representations are specified indirectly using semantic construction operators, which enforce an abstraction barrier between the grammar and the semantic representations themselves. First we present a simple grammar which is compatible with the three different sets of constructors for the three formalisms. We then extend the grammar to provide one treatment that accounts for quantifier raising in the three different semantic formalisms