Resolution lower bounds for perfect matching principles
Journal of Computer and System Sciences - Special issue on computational complexity 2002
Finding a duplicate and a missing item in a stream
TAMC'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Theory and applications of models of computation
Parameterized bounded-depth Frege is not optimal
ICALP'11 Proceedings of the 38th international colloquim conference on Automata, languages and programming - Volume Part I
Tight bounds for monotone switching networks via fourier analysis
STOC '12 Proceedings of the forty-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Parameterized Bounded-Depth Frege Is not Optimal
ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT)
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We investigate read-once branching programs for the following search problem: given a Boolean m × n matrix with m n, find either an all-zero row, or two 1’s in some column. Our primary motivation is that this models regular resolution proofs of the pigeonhole principle $$PHP^{m}_{n}$$, and that for m n2 no lower bounds are known for the length of such proofs. We prove exponential lower bounds (for arbitrarily large m!) if we further restrict this model by requiring the branching program either to finish one row of queries before asking queries about another row (the row model) or put the dual column restriction (the column model).Then we investigate a special class of resolution proofs for $$PHP^{m}_{n}$$ that operate with positive clauses of rectangular shape; we call this fragment the rectangular calculus. We show that all known upper bounds on the size of resolution proofs of $$PHP^{m}_{n}$$ actually give rise to proofs in this calculus and, inspired by this fact, also give a remarkably simple “rectangular” reformulation of the Haken–Buss–Turán lower bound for the case m ≪ n2. Finally we show that the rectangular calculus is equivalent to the column model on the one hand, and to transversal calculus on the other hand, where the latter is a natural proof system for estimating from below the transversal size of set families. In particular, our exponential lower bound for the column model translates both to the rectangular and transversal calculi.