What is lacking in curriculum schemes for computing/informatics?

  • Authors:
  • Maarten van Veen;Fred Mulder;Karel Lemmen

  • Affiliations:
  • Open University, Netherlands;Open University, Netherlands;Open University, Netherlands

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 9th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
  • Year:
  • 2004

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this paper we elaborate on the work done by IFIP Working Group 3.2 in 1997 and 2002 on various curriculum schemes for computing/informatics. It is the aim of this paper to contribute to this work by bringing in concepts and insights from curriculum research and curriculum theory. This offers an additional view on the curriculum schemes besides the more disciplinary content driven approach that mostly dominates the curriculum work. We analyze three curriculum schemes: Computing Curricula 2001 (CC2001), Informatics Curriculum Framework 2000 (ICF-2000) and Career Space (CSP) with two confronting exercises. The first exercise introduces the concepts of planned, enacted, experienced, and hidden curriculum and applies these to the process of development and implementation of curriculum schemes in general. The second exercise positions the three curriculum schemes in a generic set of curriculum components that is being used frequently in, for example, secondary education as well as in other disciplines. It appears that quite a few components are not included. The paper concludes with some suggestions for improving the development process of curriculum schemes.