Semi-automatic annotation of contested knowledge on the world wide web

Authors:
Bertrand Sereno;Simon Buckingham Shum;Enrico Motta
Affiliations:
The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK;The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK;The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
Venue:
Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters
Year:
2004

Citing 4
Cited 3

Supporting knowledge-base evolution with incremental formalization

CHI '94 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Authoring and annotation of web pages in CREAM

Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web
Summarizing scientific articles: experiments with relevance and rhetorical status

Computational Linguistics - Summarization
Scholarly publishing and argument in hyperspace

WWW '03 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web

OntoPortal: An ontology-supported portal architecture with linguistically enhanced and focused crawler technologies

Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
An ontology-supported and fully-automatic annotation technology for semantic portals

IEA/AIE'07 Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Industrial, engineering, and other applications of applied intelligent systems
Highlighting disputed claims on the web

Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.01

Visualization

Abstract

We describe a strategy to support the semantic annotation of contested knowledge, in the context of the Scholarly Ontologies project, which aims at building a network of interpretations enriching a corpus of scholarly papers. To model such knowledge, which does not have 'right' and 'wrong' values, we are building on the notion of active recommendations as a means to sparkle annotators' interest. We finally argue for a different approach to the evaluation of its impact.