Research issues in automatic database clustering
ACM SIGMOD Record
Flexible self-adjustment of task deployment in dynamic environments
Multiagent and Grid Systems
Policy-based techniques for self-managing parallel applications
The Knowledge Engineering Review
A real-time adaptive control of autonomic computing environments
CASCON '07 Proceedings of the 2007 conference of the center for advanced studies on Collaborative research
International Journal of Computer Mathematics - Distributed Algorithms in Science and Engineering
Reliable scientific service compositions
ICSOC'06 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Service-oriented computing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper addresses some controversial issues relating to two main questions. Firstly, we discuss 'man-in-the loop' issues in SAACS. Some people advocate this must always be so that man's decisions t can override autonomic components. In this case, the system has two subsystems - man and machine. Can we, however, have a fully autonomic machine - with no man in sight; even for short periods of time? What kinds of systems require man to always be in the loop? What is the optimum balance in self-to-human control? How to we determine the optimum? How far can we go in describing self-behaviour? How does a SAACS system handle unexpected behaviour? Secondly, what are the challenges/obstacles in testing SAACS in the context of self/human dilemma? Are there any lesson to be learned from other programmes e.g. Star-wars, aviation and space explorations? What role human factors and behavioural models play whilst in interacting with SAACS?