On Some Alleged Misconceptions about Fuzzy Logic

Authors:
Francis Jeffry Pelletier
Affiliations:
Department of Philosophy, Simon Fraser University, B.C., Canada/ jeffpell@sfu.ca
Venue:
Artificial Intelligence Review
Year:
2004

Citing 5
Cited 2

A model theoretic approach to propositional fuzzy logic using Beth Tableaux

Fuzzy logic for the management of uncertainty
Fuzzy Logic and the Resolution Principle

Journal of the ACM (JACM)
A fuzzy logic with interval truth values

Fuzzy Sets and Systems
Fuzzy Logic: Misconceptions and Clarifications

Artificial Intelligence Review
Responses to Elkan (Francis Jeffry Pelletier)

IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications

Explanatory model for the break of logic equivalence by irrational agents in Elkan's paradox

EUROCAST'07 Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Computer aided systems theory
Fuzzy logic and self-referential reasoning: a comparative study with some new concepts

Artificial Intelligence Review

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Entemann (2002) defends fuzzy logic by pointing to what he calls "misconceptions" concerning fuzzy logic. However, some of these ‘misconceptions’ are in fact truths, and it is Entemann who has the misconceptions. The present article points to mistakes made by Entemann in three different areas. It closes with a discussion of what sort of general considerations it would take to motivate fuzzy logic.