Waterway, shipping, and ports: modeling ship arrivals in ports

  • Authors:
  • Eelco van Asperen;Rommert Dekker;Mark Polman;Henk de Swaan Arons

  • Affiliations:
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam, DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands;Erasmus University Rotterdam, DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands;Erasmus University Rotterdam, DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands;Erasmus University Rotterdam, DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 35th conference on Winter simulation: driving innovation
  • Year:
  • 2003

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Ports provide jetty facilities for ships to load and unload their cargo. Since ship delays are costly, terminal operators attempt to minimize their number and duration. Here, simulation has proved to be a very suitable tool. However, in port simulation models, the impact of the arrival process of ships on the model outcomes tends to be underestimated. This article considers three arrival processes: stock-controlled, equidistant per ship type, and Poisson. We assess how their deployment in a port simulation model, based on data from a real case study, affects the efficiency of the loading and unloading process. Poisson, which is the chosen arrival process in many client-oriented simulations, actually performs worst in terms of both ship delays and required storage capacity. Stock-controlled arrivals perform best with regard to ship delays and required storage capacity.