Towards Perceptually Driven Segmentation Evaluation Metrics

Authors:
Elisa Drelie Gelasca;Touradj Ebrahimi;Mylène C. Q. Farias;Marco Carli;Sanjit K. Mitra
Affiliations:
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology EPFL, Switzerland;Swiss Federal Institute of Technology EPFL, Switzerland;University of California Santa Barbara;University of California Santa Barbara;University of California Santa Barbara
Venue:
CVPRW '04 Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'04) Volume 4 - Volume 04
Year:
2004

Citing 0
Cited 5

Performance evaluation in visual surveillance using the F-measure

Proceedings of the 4th ACM international workshop on Video surveillance and sensor networks
Image segmentation evaluation: A survey of unsupervised methods

Computer Vision and Image Understanding
An object-based comparative methodology for motion detection based on the F-Measure

Computer Vision and Image Understanding
Performance evaluation of image segmentation

ICIAR'06 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Image Analysis and Recognition - Volume Part I
Rough sets and neural networks based aerial images segmentation method

ICONIP'12 Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Neural Information Processing - Volume Part IV

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

To be reliable, an automatic segmentation evaluation metric has to be validated by subjective tests.In this paper, a formal protocol for subjective tests for segmentation quality assessment is presented.The most common artifacts produced by segmentation algorithms are identified and an extensive analysis of their effects on the perceived quality is performed.A psychophysical experiment was performed to assess the quality of video with segmentation errors.The results show how an objective segmentation evaluation metric can be defined as a function of various error types.