A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search
STOC '96 Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
The quantum query complexity of approximating the median and related statistics
STOC '99 Proceedings of the thirty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Quantum complexity of integration
Journal of Complexity
Quantum summation with an application to integration
Journal of Complexity
On a problem in quantum summation
Journal of Complexity
Path Integration on a Quantum Computer
Quantum Information Processing
Tractability of Approximation for Weighted Korobov Spaces on Classical and Quantum Computers
Foundations of Computational Mathematics
Quantum approximation I. Embeddings of finite-dimensional Lp spaces
Journal of Complexity
The Quantum Setting with Randomized Queries for Continuous Problems
Quantum Information Processing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We study the quantum summation (QS) algorithm of Brassard et al. (see Brassard et al. (in: S.J. Lomonaco, H.E. Brandt (Eds.) Quantum Computation and Information, American Mathematical Society Providence, RI, 2002)) that approximates the arithmetic mean of a Boolean function defined on N elements. We improve error bounds presented in Brassard et al. (2002) in the worst-probabilistic setting, and present new error bounds in the average-probabilistic setting. In particular, in the worst-probabilistic setting, we prove that the error of the QS algorithm using M - 1 quantum queries is 3/4 πM-1 with probability 8/π2, which improves the error bound πM-1 + π2M-2 of Brassard et al. (2002). We also present error bounds with probabilities p ∈ (½,8/π2 and show that they are sharp for large M and NM-1. In the average-probabilistic setting, we prove that the QS algorithm has error of order min{M-1,N-1/2} iff M is divisible by 4. This bound is optimal, as recently shown in Papageorgiou (Average case quantum lower bounds for computing the Boolean means, this issue). For M not divisible by 4, the QS algorithm is far from being optimal if M ≪ N1/2 since its error is proportional to M-1.