Computer anxiety: sex, race and age
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model
Management Science
Computer anxiety and social workers: differences by access, use, and training
Journal of Technology in Human Services
Social stratification and the digital divide
Social Science Computer Review
Social Science Computer Review - Special issue: Jane fountain's "building the virtual state"
The Internet knowledge (iKnow) measure
Computers in Human Behavior
The socio-economic dimensions of ICT-driven educational change
Computers & Education
Computer anxiety: A cross-cultural comparative study of Dutch and Turkish university students
Computers in Human Behavior
The technology profile inventory: Construction, validation, and application
Computers in Human Behavior
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Factors Influencing Computer Literacy of Taiwan and South Korea Nurses
Journal of Medical Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The proposition that socio-economic background relates to amount of current computer use indirectly, via its relationship with computer experience and computer anxiety, was tested with questionnaire data from a sample of 267 university students. The results supported the proposition, as they indicated a causal path model that contained a positive indirect relationship of socio-economic background with the amount of current computer use, via computer experience and computer anxiety. Socio-economic background had a direct positive relationship with computer experience and an indirect negative relationship with computer anxiety. The pattern of relationships was held over and above the variance accounted for by the set of control variables that included, among others, computer access and sex. The findings are supportive of the digital divide and they imply that information technology may in fact be increasing inequalities among social strata in their access to employment opportunities. The limitations of the study along with potential directions for future research are discussed.