Uses of nonmonotonic logic in natural language understanding: generalized implicatures
Uses of nonmonotonic logic in natural language understanding: generalized implicatures
Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature
Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature
Persistence and minimality in epistemic logic
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Explaining quantity implicatures
TARK '07 Proceedings of the 11th conference on Theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge
Let's talk about our “being”: A linguistic-based ontology framework for coordinating agents
Applied Ontology - Formal Ontologies for Communicating Agents
Expressing Ignorance or Indifference
Logic, Language, and Computation
A game-theoretic model of metaphorical bargaining
ACL '10 Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Experimental detection of embedded implicatures
Proceedings of the 17th Amsterdam colloquium conference on Logic, language and meaning
Let's talk about our “being”: A linguistic-based ontology framework for coordinating agents
Applied Ontology - Formal Ontologies for Communicating Agents
Explaining Quantity Implicatures
Journal of Logic, Language and Information
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In terms of Groenendijk and Stokhof驴s (1984) formalization of exhaustive interpretation, many conversational implicatures can be accounted for. In this paper we justify and generalize this approach. Our justification proceeds by relating their account via Halpern and Moses驴 (1984) non-monotonic theory of `only knowing驴 to the Gricean maxims of Quality and the first sub-maxim of Quantity. The approach of Groenendijk and Stokhof (1984) is generalized such that it can also account for implicatures that are triggered in subclauses not entailed by the whole complex sentence.