CCMPerf: A Benchmarking Tool for CORBA Component Model Implementations

  • Authors:

  • Arvind S. Krishna;Balachandran Natarajan;Aniruddha Gokhale;Douglas C. Schmidt;Nanbor Wang;Gautam Thaker

  • Affiliations:

  • Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA;Computer Science Department, Washington University, St. Louis, USA;Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA;Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA;Computer Science Department, Washington University, St. Louis, USA;Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Labs, Cherry Hill, USA

  • Venue:
  • Real-Time Systems
  • Year:
  • 2005

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) middleware is now widely used to develop distributed real-time and embedded (DRE) systems. DRE systems are themselves increasingly combined to form "systems of systems" that have diverse quality of service (QoS) requirements. Earlier generations of COTS middleware, such as Object Request Brokers (ORBs) based on the CORBA 2.x standard, did not facilitate the separation of QoS policies from application functionality, which made it hard to configure and validate complex DRE applications. The new generation of component middleware, such as the CORBA Component Model (CCM) based on the CORBA 3.0 standard, addresses the limitations of earlier generation middleware by establishing standards for implementing, packaging, assembling, and deploying component implementations.There has been little systematic empirical study of the performance characteristics of component middleware implementations in the context of DRE systems. This paper therefore provides four contributions to the study of CCM for DRE systems. First, we describe the challenges involved in benchmarking different CCM implementations. Second, we describe key criteria for comparing different CCM implementations using key black-box and white-box metrics. Third, we describe the design of our CCMPerf benchmarking suite to illustrate test categories that evaluate aspects of CCM implementation to determine their suitability for the DRE domain. Fourth, we use CCMPerf to benchmark CIAO implementation of CCM and analyze the results. These results show that the CIAO implementation based on the more sophisticated CORBA 3.0 standard has comparable DRE performance to that of the TAO implementation based on the earlier CORBA 2.x standard.