A study of factors affecting the utility of implicit relevance feedback
Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
A study of interface support mechanisms for interactive information retrieval
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology - Research Articles
Improving MEDLINE document retrieval using automatic query expansion
ICADL'07 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Asian digital libraries: looking back 10 years and forging new frontiers
On the query reformulation technique for effective MEDLINE document retrieval
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Searchers can find the construction of query statements for submission to Information Retrieval (IR) systems a problematic activity. These problems are confounded by uncertainty about the information they are searching for, or an unfamiliarity with the retrieval system being used or collection being searched. On the World Wide Web these problems are potentially more acute as searchers receive little or no training in how to search effectively. Relevance feedback (RF) techniques allow searchers to directly communicate what information is relevant and help them construct improved query statements. However, the techniques require explicit relevance assessments that intrude on searchers' primary lines of activity and as such, searchers may be unwilling to provide this feedback. Implicit feedback systems are unobtrusive and make inferences of what is relevant based on searcher interaction. They gather information to better represent searcher needs whilst minimising the burden of explicitly reformulating queries or directly providing relevance information.