Model T: an empirical model for user registration patterns in a campus wireless LAN

  • Authors:
  • Ravi Jain;Dan Lelescu;Mahadevan Balakrishnan

  • Affiliations:
  • DoCoMo Communications Labs, San Jose, CA;DoCoMo Communications Labs, San Jose, CA;DoCoMo Communications Labs, San Jose, CA

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
  • Year:
  • 2005

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We derive an empirical model for spatial registration patterns of mobile users as they move within a campus wireless local area network (WLAN) environment and register at different access points. Such a model can be very useful in a variety of simulation studies of the performance of mobile wireless systems, such as that of resource management and mobility management protocols. We base the model on extensive experimental data from a campus WiFi LAN installation, representing traces from about 6000 users over a period of about 2 years. We divide the empirical data available to us into training and test data sets, develop the model based on the training set, and evaluate it against the test set.The model shows that user registration patterns exhibit a distinct hierarchy, and that WLAN access points (APs) can be clustered based on registration patterns. Cluster size distributions are highly skewed, as are intra-cluster transition probabilities and trace lengths, which can all be modeled well by the heavy-tailed Weibull distribution. The fraction of popular APs in a cluster, as a function of cluster size, can be modeled by exponential distributions. There is general similarity across hierarchies, in that inter-cluster registration patterns tend to have the same characteristics and distributions as intra-cluster patterns.We generate synthetic traces for intra-cluster transitions, inter-cluster transitions, and complete traces, and compare them against the corresponding traces from the test set. We define a set of metrics that evaluate how well the model captures the empirical features it is trying to represent. We find that the synthetic traces agree very well with the test set in terms of the metrics. We also compare the model to a simple modified random waypoint model as a baseline, and show the latter is not at all representative of the real data.The user of the model has the opportunity to use it as is, or can modify model parameters, such as the degree of randomness in registration patterns. We close with a brief discussion of further work to refine and extend the model.