A drosophila for computational dialectics

Authors:
Simon Wells;Chris Reed
Affiliations:
University of Dundee, Park Wynd, Dundee, U.K.;University of Dundee, Park Wynd, Dundee, U.K.
Venue:
Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Year:
2005

Citing 4
Cited 1

Desiderata for agent argumentation protocols

Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 1
Commands in Dialogue Logic

FAPR '96 Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning
Towards a formal and implemented model of argumentation schemes in agent communication

ArgMAS'04 Proceedings of the First international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Formal dialectic specification

ArgMAS'04 Proceedings of the First international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems

Dialogical Argument as an Interface to Complex Debates

IEEE Intelligent Systems

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Systems of argumentation or 'computational dialectic' are emerging as a powerful means of structuring inter-agent communication in multi-agent systems. Individual systems of computational dialectic have been suggested and implemented to tackle specific problems but no comprehensive assessment has been made of such systems in general. Metrics by which systems of dialectic can be measured and used to provide justification for the widespread adoption of dialectic systems in inter-agent communication are needed. This paper introduces GC0, which is a scenario for dialectic testing, and the Sweetwater framework, a software implementation of GC0 for automated testing of dialectic.