Improving the quality of software quality determination processes
Proceedings of the IFIP TC2/WG2.5 working conference on Quality of numerical software: assessment and enhancement
Some observations on software quality
ACM-SE 37 Proceedings of the 37th annual Southeast regional conference (CD-ROM)
Extreme programming explained: embrace change
Extreme programming explained: embrace change
IEEE Software
Extreme Programming from a CMM Perspective
IEEE Software
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Software Quality Assurance—Concepts and Misconceptions
EUROMICRO '98 Proceedings of the 24th Conference on EUROMICRO - Volume 2
The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction
The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction
Software Quality and Agile Methods
COMPSAC '04 Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference - Volume 01
Agile versus CMMI - process template selection and integration with microsoft team foundation server
Proceedings of the 46th Annual Southeast Regional Conference on XX
A novel metric of software quality: structural availability
ACOS'06 Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS international conference on Applied computer science
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
The support of software quality in a software development process may be regarded under two aspects: first, by providing techniques, which support the development of high quality software and second, by providing techniques, which assure the required quality attributes in existing artifacts. Both approaches have to be combined to achieve effective and successful software engineering.In this study, we compare three of the most industrially relevant software development process models (Rational Unified Process (RUP), Microsoft Solution Framework (MSF) and Extreme Programming (XP)) regarding their software quality support in terms of software quality development and software quality assurance. Based on the results we propose a de-facto standard for quality support in software development process models.