The competitiveness of on-line assignments
SODA '92 Proceedings of the third annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
On-line routing of virtual circuits with applications to load balancing and machine scheduling
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Convergence complexity of optimistic rate-based flow-control algorithms
Journal of Algorithms
Phantom: a simple and effective flow control scheme
Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking
Fairness in routing and load balancing
Journal of Computer and System Sciences - Special issue on Internet algorithms
Combining fairness with throughout: online routing with multiple objectives
Journal of Computer and System Sciences - Special issue on Internet algorithms
Fairness measures for resource allocation
FOCS '00 Proceedings of the 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Pricing for fairness: distributed resource allocation for multiple objectives
Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
Bi-objective Optimization: An Online Algorithm for Job Assignment
GPC '09 Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advances in Grid and Pervasive Computing
On the communication and streaming complexity of maximum bipartite matching
Proceedings of the twenty-third annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete Algorithms
Journal of Scheduling
ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG)
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This article relates the notion of fairness in online routing and load balancing to vector majorization as developed by Hardy et al. [1929]. We define α-supermajorization as an approximate form of vector majorization, and show that this definition generalizes and strengthens the prefix measure proposed by Kleinberg et al. [2001] as well as the popular notion of max-min fairness.The article revisits the problem of online load-balancing for unrelated 1-∞ machines from the viewpoint of fairness. We prove that a greedy approach is O(log n)-supermajorized by all other allocations, where n is the number of jobs. This means the greedy approach is globally O(log n)-fair. This may be contrasted with polynomial lower bounds presented by Goel et al. [2001] for fair online routing.We also define a machine-centric view of fairness using the related concept of submajorization. We prove that the greedy online algorithm is globally O(log m)-balanced, where m is the number of machines.