Collaboration and Trust in Healthcare Innovation: The eDiaMoND Case Study
Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
The sociological turn in information science
Journal of Information Science
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Comprehension of Invisible Specialty in Research Field through Interaction with Novice Researchers
WI-IAT '08 Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 03
Journal of Information Science
E-mail networks and leadership performance
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Link prediction in multi-relational collaboration networks
Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining
Subfield effects on the core of coauthors
Scientometrics
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This article addresses the invisible college concept with the intent of developing a consensus regarding its definition. Emphasis is placed on the term as it was defined and used in Derek de Solla Price's work (1963, 1986) and reviewed on the basis of its thematic progress in past research over the years. Special attention is given to Lievrouw's (1990) article concerning the structure versus social process problem to show that both conditions are essential to the invisible college and may be reconciled. A new definition of the invisible college is also introduced, including a proposed research model. With this model, researchers are encouraged to study the invisible college by focusing on three critical components—the subject specialty, the scientists as social actors, and the information use environment (IUE). © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.