A Comparison of Two Programming Models for Pervasive Computing

Authors:
Hen-I Yang;Erwin Jansen;Sumi Helal
Affiliations:
University of Florida, Gainesville, USA;University of Florida, Gainesville, USA;University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
Venue:
SAINT-W '06 Proceedings of the International Symposium on Applications on Internet Workshops
Year:
2006

Citing 0
Cited 4

A service oriented architecture for wireless sensor and actor network applications

SAICSIT '06 Proceedings of the 2006 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countries
Towards service-oriented recommendation functionalities within pervasive e-learning systems

International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining
UbiSOA Dashboard: Integrating the Physical and Digital Domains through Mashups

Proceedings of the Symposium on Human Interface 2009 on ConferenceUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Part I: Held as Part of HCI International 2009
An Application Framework for a Situation-Aware System Support for Smart Spaces

OTM '09 Proceedings of the Confederated International Workshops and Posters on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: ADI, CAMS, EI2N, ISDE, IWSSA, MONET, OnToContent, ODIS, ORM, OTM Academy, SWWS, SEMELS, Beyond SAWSDL, and COMBEK 2009

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Establishing suitable programming models for pervasive spaces is essential in improving the productivity, enhancing the quality of pervasive systems, and creating an open platform for interoperability. Two different models, namely, the context-driven model and the service-oriented model, have been proposed and studied for their feasibilities as the foundation for implementing programmable pervasive spaces. We present these two alternatives and contrast their advantages and disadvantages.