Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators: Research group indicator distributions and correlations

Authors:
Anthony F. J. van Raan
Affiliations:
Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, P.O. Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands
Venue:
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Year:
2006

Citing 0
Cited 8

Performance-related differences of bibliometric statistical properties of research groups: Cumulative advantages and hierarchically layered networks

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Self-citation as an impact-reinforcing mechanism in the science system

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Correlation between impact and collaboration

Scientometrics
Relations between the shape of a size-frequency distribution and the shape of a rank-frequency distribution

Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates

Scientometrics
Scholarly publishing in social sciences and humanities, associated probabilities of belonging and its spectrum: a quantitative approach for the Spanish case

Scientometrics
Detecting the knowledge structure of bioinformatics by mining full-text collections

Scientometrics
What do global university rankings really measure? The search for the X factor and the X entity

Scientometrics

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this article we present an empirical approach to the study of the statistical properties of bibliometric indicators on a very relevant but not simply “available” aggregation level: the research group. We focus on the distribution functions of a coherent set of indicators that are used frequently in the analysis of research performance. In this sense, the coherent set of indicators acts as a measuring instrument. Better insight into the statistical properties of a measuring instrument is necessary to enable assessment of the instrument itself. The most basic distribution in bibliometric analysis is the distribution of citations over publications, and this distribution is very skewed. Nevertheless, we clearly observe the working of the central limit theorem and find that at the level of research groups the distribution functions of the main indicators, particularly the journal- normalized and the field-normalized indicators, approach normal distributions. The results of our study underline the importance of the idea of “group oeuvre,” that is, the role of sets of related publications as a unit of analysis. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.