Semantic Web Services Grounding

Authors:
Jacek Kopecky;Dumitru Roman;Matthew Moran;Dieter Fensel
Affiliations:
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, Innsbruck;Digital Enterprise Research Institute, Innsbruck;Digital Enterprise Research Institute, Galway;Digital Enterprise Research Institute, Galway
Venue:
AICT-ICIW '06 Proceedings of the Advanced Int'l Conference on Telecommunications and Int'l Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services
Year:
2006

Citing 0
Cited 8

Designing semantic web services using conceptual model

Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing
Dynamic Service Discovery Through Meta-interactions with Service Providers

ESWC '07 Proceedings of the 4th European conference on The Semantic Web: Research and Applications
Semantically-Aided Data-Aware Service Workflow Composition

SOFSEM '09 Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science
Smart environments meet the semantic web

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
A semantically enabled service oriented architecture

WImBI'06 Proceedings of the 1st WICI international conference on Web intelligence meets brain informatics
Semantic web service offer discovery

OTM'07 Proceedings of the 2007 OTM confederated international conference on On the move to meaningful internet systems - Volume Part I
Aggregated search of data and services

Information Systems
Towards linked open services and processes

FIS'10 Proceedings of the Third future internet conference on Future internet

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.06

Visualization

Abstract

Semantic Web Services frameworks like OWL-S and WSMO combine semantic descriptions of Web service capabilities, inputs, outputs and behavior with the syntactic interface descriptions in WSDL and XML Schema. The glue between the semantic and syntactic description layers is called grounding. In this paper we identify the uses for grounding and we present the existing grounding approaches and propose new ones, discussing their respective advantages and drawbacks. Finally, we compare OWLS and WSMO with regards to their support of the presented grounding approaches and we recommend which approaches should be considered for future work.