Predictability, Complexity, and Learning

  • Authors:
  • William Bialek;Ilya Nemenman;Naftali Tishby

  • Affiliations:
  • NEC Research Institute, Princeton, NJ 08540, U.S.A.;NEC Research Institute, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, U.S.A., and Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A.;NEC Research Institute, Princeton, NJ 08540, U.S.A., and School of Computer Science and Engineering and Center for Neural Computation, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel

  • Venue:
  • Neural Computation
  • Year:
  • 2001

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We define predictive information Ipred(T) as the mutual information between the past and the future of a time series. Three qualitatively different behaviors are found in the limit of large observation times T:Ipred(T) can remain finite, grow logarithmically, or grow as a fractional power law. If the time series allows us to learn a model with a finite number of parameters, then Ipred(T) grows logarithmically with a coefficient that counts the dimensionality of the model space. In contrast, power-law growth is associated, for example, with the learning of infinite parameter (or nonparametric) models such as continuous functions with smoothness constraints. There are connections between the predictive information and measures of complexity that have been defined both in learning theory and the analysis of physical systems through statistical mechanics and dynamical systems theory. Furthermore, in the same way that entropy provides the unique measure of available information consistent with some simple and plausible conditions, we argue that the divergent part of Ipred(T) provides the unique measure for the complexity of dynamics underlying a time series. Finally, we discuss how these ideas may be useful in problems in physics, statistics, and biology.