An O(log n) expected rounds randomized byzantine generals protocol
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Flipping persuasively in constant time
SIAM Journal on Computing
An Optimal Probabilistic Protocol for Synchronous Byzantine Agreement
SIAM Journal on Computing
Fully Polynomial Byzantine Agreement for Processors in Rounds
SIAM Journal on Computing
A tight lower bound for randomized synchronous consensus
PODC '98 Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
Fault-tolerant Computation in the Full Information Model
SIAM Journal on Computing
Reaching Agreement in the Presence of Faults
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Perfect information leader election in log * n+0(1) rounds
Journal of Computer and System Sciences
Optimal Early Stopping in Distributed Consensus (Extended Abstract)
WDAG '92 Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Distributed Algorithms
Asymptotically Optimal Distributed Consensus (Extended Abstract)
ICALP '89 Proceedings of the 16th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming
Noncryptographic Selection Protocols
FOCS '99 Proceedings of the 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Another advantage of free choice (Extended Abstract): Completely asynchronous agreement protocols
PODC '83 Proceedings of the second annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
An asynchronous [(n - 1)/3]-resilient consensus protocol
PODC '84 Proceedings of the third annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
Fast asynchronous byzantine agreement and leader election with full information
Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
Lower bounds for randomized consensus under a weak adversary
Proceedings of the twenty-seventh ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
Tight bounds for asynchronous randomized consensus
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
On expected constant-round protocols for Byzantine agreement
Journal of Computer and System Sciences
From almost everywhere to everywhere: byzantine agreement with Õ(n³/²) bits
DISC'09 Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Distributed computing
Fast asynchronous Byzantine agreement and leader election with full information
ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG)
Distributed agreement with optimal communication complexity
SODA '10 Proceedings of the twenty-first annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete Algorithms
How efficient can gossip be? (on the cost of resilient information exchange)
ICALP'10 Proceedings of the 37th international colloquium conference on Automata, languages and programming: Part II
Stabilizing consensus with the power of two choices
Proceedings of the twenty-third annual ACM symposium on Parallelism in algorithms and architectures
The contest between simplicity and efficiency in asynchronous byzantine agreement
DISC'11 Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Distributed computing
Lower Bounds for Randomized Consensus under a Weak Adversary
SIAM Journal on Computing
Proceedings of the 2013 ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
On the complexity of asynchronous agreement against powerful adversaries
Proceedings of the 2013 ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
Brief announcement: byzantine agreement with a strong adversary in polynomial expected time
Proceedings of the 2013 ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
Byzantine agreement in polynomial expected time: [extended abstract]
Proceedings of the forty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We present a randomized Byzantine Agreement (BA) protocol with an expected running time of O(log n) rounds, in a synchronous full-information network of n players. For any constant ε 0, the constructed protocol tolerates t non-adaptive Byzantine faults, as long as n ≥ (4 + ε)t. In the full-information model, no restrictions are placed on the computational power of the faulty players or the information available to them. In particular, the faulty players may be infinitely powerful, and they can observe all communication among the honest players.This constitutes significant progress over the best known randomized BA protocol in the same setting which has a round-complexity of Θ(t/log n) rounds [9], and answers an open problem posed by Chor and Dwork [10].