A Practical Guide to SysML: Systems Modeling Language
A Practical Guide to SysML: Systems Modeling Language
Scalable Semantic Annotation Using Lattice-Based Ontologies
MODELS '09 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems
Disciplined heterogeneous modeling
MODELS'10 Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Model driven engineering languages and systems: Part II
Graphical simulation environments for modelling and simulation of integrative physiology
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
EMSOFT '11 Proceedings of the ninth ACM international conference on Embedded software
Modelling of complex software systems: a reasoned overview
FORTE'06 Proceedings of the 26th IFIP WG 6.1 international conference on Formal Techniques for Networked and Distributed Systems
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
This article describes activity modeling as specified by the Systems Modeling Language (as specified by the SysML Merge Team, , February 2006) and the finalization of the Unified Modeling Language version 2 (UML 2). It reviews and updates an earlier proposed alignment between Enhanced Functional Flow Block Diagrams (EFFBD), UML 2 Activities, and requirements developed by the International Council on Systems Engineering and Object Management Group. It presents a spectrum of activity modeling techniques, ranging from a widely used systems engineering diagram, the EFFBD, to continuous flow modeling. The techniques include control capabilities, continuous system concepts, and others related to functional decomposition and allocation. The article also describes refinements of activity modeling concepts identified during SysML development. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 9:160–186, 2006This article is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America. Commercial equipment and materials might be identified to adequately specify certain procedures. In no case does such identification imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.