On the efficiency of logic-based diagnosis

  • Authors:
  • Abdul Sattar;Randy Goebel

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H1;Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H1

  • Venue:
  • IEA/AIE '90 Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Industrial and engineering applications of artificial intelligence and expert systems - Volume 1
  • Year:
  • 1990

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Diagnosis is a problem in which one must explain the discrepancy between the observed and correct system behavior by assuming some component (possibly multiple components) of the system is functioning abnormally. A diagnostic reasoning system must deal with two issues concerning computational efficiency. The first is efficient search in a complex space for all possible diagnoses for a given set of observations about the faulty system. The second is efficient discrimination amongst multiple competing diagnoses.We consider the problem of diagnosis from the perspective of the Theorist hypothetical reasoning framework which provides a simple and intuitive diagnostic method. We propose an extension to the Theorist framework that modifies the consistency check mechanism to incrementally compute inconsistencies, sometimes referred to as nogoods, and to identify crucial literals to perform tests for discriminating among competing diagnoses. A prototype is implemented in Cprolog and its empirical efficiency is shown by considering examples from two different domains of diagnosis.