ACM SIGCHI Bulletin
Dynamic class loading in the Java virtual machine
Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications
Non-intrusive object introspection in C++: architecture and application
Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Software engineering
Automated test oracles for GUIs
SIGSOFT '00/FSE-8 Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering: twenty-first century applications
Coverage criteria for GUI testing
Proceedings of the 8th European software engineering conference held jointly with 9th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering
Why are Human-Computer interfaces Difficult to Design and Implement?
Why are Human-Computer interfaces Difficult to Design and Implement?
A comprehensive framework for testing graphical user interfaces
A comprehensive framework for testing graphical user interfaces
Challenges and opportunities for improving code-based testing of graphical user interfaces
Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering - Selected papers from the International Conference on Computer Science, Software Engineering, Information Technology, e-Business, and Applications, 2004
Display button: a marriage of GUI and PUI
HCI'07 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human-computer interaction: interaction platforms and techniques
Review of recent systems for automatic assessment of programming assignments
Proceedings of the 10th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
The increasing expectations of users for ever more functional and impressive Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) have instigated changes to the way in which programming languages are taught. The rise in popularity of the subject matter has caused problems for lecturers with regards to time and costs. The numbers of student solutions that need to be marked in short periods of time are barely feasible for one person alone or even a marking team to manage; this has been a major influence in the development of marking systems. No system exists for marking GUI programs, indeed few exist for marking any programs. This paper presents the concepts behind an introspective testing and marking tool for GUIs. The hierarchical relationship between interface components and the use of an introspective approach allows us to retrieve data from the GUI components themselves, rather than through relative estimations. This not only allows for dynamic testing of the student's solutions but also aesthetic testing measures.